SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1980 Supreme(Kar) 77

M.S.PATIL
CHANNAPPA ANDANAPPA – Appellant
Versus
STATE – Respondent


M. S. PATIL, J.

( 1 ) THIS Revision is directed against the order dated 22-9-1979 made by the Taluk executive Magistrate, Ron, in No. MAG sr. 6/79 on the file of his Court refusing to give certified copy of the F. I. R.

( 2 ) THE petitioners were arrested by the police on the allegation that they were involved in some crime over a dispute of possession of land and produced before the Taluka Executive Magistrate. The taluka Executive Magistrate ordered to release them on bail. Petitioner No. 7 veerappa Hanumareddy Halli, asked the magistrate to furnish him the certified copy of the report given by the Police. He made an application to that effect and deposited Rs. 21 towards the cost of the copy. The learned Taluka Executive magistrate refused to give the copy applied on the ground it was not a public document, the petitioners have filed this revision.

( 3 ) THE F. I. R. being a record of the acts of the public officers prepared in discharge of the official duty is such a public document as defined under S. 74 of the Evidence act. Under S. 76 of the Evidence Act every public officer having the custody of a public document, which any person has a right to inspect is bound to give such



Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top