SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1980 Supreme(Kar) 118

G.N.SABHAHIT, D.R.VITHAL RAO
RUDRIAH – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF KARNATAKA – Respondent


SABHAHIT, J.

( 1 ) THIS contempt petition is filed on the averments that the complainant obtained an order of temporary injunction against the accused from the trial court in O. S. No. 132 of 1976 on the file of the court of the Munsiff, Tumkur. Subsequently he filed another suit O. S. No. 297 of 1976 for declaration of title and injunction against the accused. In both the suits he obtained temporary injunction orders. The said orders were confirmed by the first appellate Court- it is his case now that the defendants in the suits, through their agents, have started disobeying the injunction order. Hence, the present petition for contempt of Court. It is against the State of Karnataka, one Sri B. Srinivasan, assistant Commissioner, Sri Aswathaiah, block Development Officer, Sri Lak- shman, Junior Engineer and the Sub-Inspector of Police and several others

( 2 ) ORDER issued under I. A. I. in o. S. No. 132 of 1976 and 297 of 1973 dated 31-3-1980, passed by the Principal munsiff at Tumkur reads:"i. A. I is allowed in both the suits in the following terms. Temporary injunction is granted against the defendants in respect of the suit land excepting 1 acre 20 guntas lying between the boun








Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top