SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1980 Supreme(Kar) 113

K.J.SHETTY, M.N.VENKATACHALIAH
THIMMA – Appellant
Versus
UNION OF INDIA – Respondent


JAGANNATHA SHETTY, J.

( 1 ) THE Petitioners herein are prisoners undergoing life imprisonment. They were convicted of a capital offence, that is, an offence for which death is one of the punishments prescribed by law. Their common case is that they have suffered imprisonment exceeding fourteen years including the remissions earned by them and are,, therefore, entitled to be considered for release if not set at liberty in the normal course. They complain that the State Government has refused to consider their cases on the ground that S- 433a cripc 1973 ("the Code") is a bar for such consideration. They have asked for a declaration that S. 433a is inapplicable to their cases.

( 2 ) THE petitions are resisted by the respondents on the sole ground that the petitioners have not yet served fourteen years of imprisonment as required by S. 433a of the Code.

( 3 ) THE decision on these petitions, therefore, turns on the true scope of s. 433a arid for immediate reference the same is set out below:"433a Restriction on powers of remission or commutation in certain cases:-Notwithstanding anything contained in section 432, where a sentence of imprisonment for life is imposed on conviction of a p








Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top