1981 Supreme(Kar) 30
Karnataka High Court
VATSALA - Appellant
Versus
SUB-REGISTRAR and MARRIAGE OFFICER - Respondent
Decided On : 01-29-81
W.P. : 502 of 1981
L.SRINIVASA REDDY, M.GOPALKRISHNA SHETTY
The Special Marriage Act, 1954 allows marriage between any two persons in India, irrespective of their nationality, under its provisions.
Headnote:
foreigner - Marriage under Special Marriage Act, 1954 - S. 1(2), S. 4 - The court held that the Special Marriage Act, 1954 allows marriage between any two persons in India, whether one or both are foreigners or Indian citizens, under its provisions.
Fact of the Case:
The petitioners, an Indian national and a UK citizen, intended to marry under the Special Marriage Act, 1954. The authorities refused to solemnize the marriage citing that the Act applies only to Indian citizens.
Finding of the Court:
The court found that the Special Marriage Act, 1954 allows marriage between any two persons in India, irrespective of their nationality, under its provisions.
Issues: The issue was whether a foreign national can marry an Indian citizen in India under the Special Marriage Act, 1954.
Ratio Decidendi: The court interpreted the provisions of the Special Marriage Act, 1954, and relied on the statement of objects and reasons to conclude that the Act allows marriage between any two persons in India, regardless of their nationality.
Final Decision: The court allowed the writ petition, directing the authorities to solemnize and register the marriage under the provisions of the Special Marriage Act, 1954.
( 1 ) THIS writ petition gives rise to a short but interesting point of law, namely, whether a foreigner can get married in india with a girl of Indian Nationality under the provisions of the Special Marriage act, 1954 (hereinafter referred to as the Act), This is a matter of first impression so far as this court is concerned and the counsel were unable to present before me any precedent even of any other High Court in India on this aspect.
( 2 ) THE brief facts germane for the decision of the point at issue briefly stated are : the first petitioner Kumari Vatsala intends to marry the second petitioner michael Caird, who is a citizen of United kingdom, residing in Bangalore. He is aged about 30 years. The petitioners decided to solemnize their marriage under the Act and therefore gave a notice under s. 6 of the said Act of their intention to solemnize the marriage. Notice was given on 24-11-1980. The first respondent, namely, the Sub-Registrar and Marriage officer, received the said notice. Thereafter the first respondent addressed a letter dated 24-12-1980 to the second respondent and sent a copy of the said letter to the second petitioner. A true copy of the said letter is produced at annexure 'a' in the writ petition. By that letter the first respondent opined that the provisions of Act apply only to marriage between Indian Nationals and not between foreign nationals and Indian nationals and therefore he solicited clarification from the second respondent, namely, the Chief Registrar of Births, deaths and Marriages, whether the marriage in question could be solemnized under the Act as the bride-groom is a foreign national. The second respondent by his letter dated 26-12-1980 wrote to the first respondent that in view of S. 4 ( ) of the Act, both parties should be citizens of India and domiciled in the said territories and therefore the marriage could not be solemnized under the Act. A copy of that letter was forwarded by the first respondent to the present first petitioner for information. It is produced in the writ petition at annexure ,b'. Thus the writ petitioners were informed that their marriage could not be solemnized under the provisions of the Act, in the circumstances. It is against that communication refusing to solemnize and register the marriage under the provisions of the aforesaid Act that the present writ petition is directed.
( 3 ) IT is prayed in the writ petition that this Court may issue a writ of mandamus directing the first respondent to solemnize the marriage of the petitioners in. accordance with the provisions of Act. The point, therefore, that arises for my consideration in this writ petition is whether the marriage can be solemnized of an Indian Citizen with a foreign national in India under the provisions of the special Marriage Act, 1954.
( 4 ) MY attention was invited to the Act by the learned counsel for the writ petitioners. S. 1 (2)reads as under: "it extends to the whole of India except the State of Jammu and kashmir and applies also to citizens of India domiciled in the territories to which this Act extends who are (in the State of Jammu and Kashmir)" he further invited my attention to S. 4 of the Act which stipulates conditions relating to solemnization of Special Marriages. It reads :"notwithstanding anything contained in any other law for the time being in force relating to the solemnization of marriages, a marriage between any two persons may be solemnized under this Act, if at the time of the marriage the following conditions are fulfilled. . . . . . . . . . "
( 5 ) THUS, the learned counsel for the petitioners invited my attention to the fact that S. 4 enables a marriage registrar to solemnize the marriage between any two persons in India notwithslanding anything to the contrary contained in any other law for the time being in force, provided the conditions mentioned therein were satisfied.
( 6 ) HE further argued that sub-sec. (2) of S. 1 of the Act, specifically stat