SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1981 Supreme(Kar) 103

A.N.SEN, E.S.VENKATARAMIAH, V.D.TULZAPURKAR
STATE OF KARNATAKA – Appellant
Versus
RAGHURAMA SHETTY – Respondent


VENKATARAMIAH, J.

( 1 ) THE question which arises for considera,tion in these appeals by certificate is whether the respondents (hereinafter referred to as 'the assessees') are liable to pay purchase tax under S. 6 (i) of the Karnataka Sales Tax Act, 1957 (hereinafter referred to as the act') on the turnover consisting of the price paid by them for purchasing paddy for the purpose of converting it into rice for sale, in their respective rice mills.

( 2 ) THE assessees are owners of rice mills in the State of Karnataka and are registered dealers under the Act. In the course of their business, they purchase paddy and after milling paddy sell the resultant rice. During the assessment years, the assessees purchased paddy from agriculturists who were not liable to pay sales tax. The assessing authority under the Act levied on the asses- see in each of these cases purchase tax on the purchase turnover of paddy under S. 6 (i) of the Act. The appeals filed by the assessees against the said assessments were dismissed by the appellate authority. The Karna,taka sales Tax Appellate Tribunal allowed the appeals filed by the assessees against the orders of the appellate authority except the one














Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top