SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1981 Supreme(Kar) 95

M.RAMA JOIS, M.K.SRINIVASA IYENGAR
STATE OF KARNATAKA – Appellant
Versus
SHAW WALLACE AND CO. LTD. – Respondent


Advocates:
C.NATARAJAN, K.P.KUMAR, M.R.Vanaja

( 1 ) THIS revision petition is preferred by the State against the order of the karnataka Appellate Tribunal, which upheld the contention of the assessee that the bottles and crates in which liquor had been sold by it could not be made liable to pay sales tax at the rate applicable to liquor under Item-38 of the Second Schedule of the karnataka Sales Tax Act. 1957 (hereinafter referred to as 'the Act the Tribunal held that there was a separate agreement in regard to the sale of bottles and crates and, therefore, value of glass bottles would have to be subjected to tax under Item-109 of the Second Schedule to the Karnataka Sales Tax Act and as far as the crates were concerned which were of wooden material they would be liable to tax under S. 5 (1) of the act. As the exact figures had not been ascertained by the assessing authority it remanded the matter to him to determine the values of these items separately and charge tax accordingly.

( 2 ) IN this revision petition it is contended that this view taken by the Tribunal is erroneous and the action of the authorities to levy tax at 25 per cent under item-38 of the second Schedule in regard to the containers also should have been uphe







Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top