SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1981 Supreme(Kar) 87

N.R.KUDOOR
RACHAPPA MUDAKAPPA – Appellant
Versus
TIPPANNA ALMAPPA – Respondent


Advocates:
A.K.Lakshmeswar, B.G.SRIDHARAN, P.R.Adhyapak, V.T.RAYA REDDY

N. R. KUDOOR, J.

( 1 ) THE appellant Rachappa Mudakappa Palled in this second appeal, brought L. C. Suit No. 163/66 on the file of the Munsiff Gadag, against the defendants for the specific performance of the agreement of sale Ex. P-8 executed by the 1st defendant tippanna Almappa Kari on 16-6-63 agreeing to sell certain items of immovable properties or in the alternative for the refund of a sum of Rs. 1,000 paid by the plaintiff to the 1st defendant under the said agreement together with interest and some other conseqential reliefs.

( 2 ) THE defendants resisted the suit on several grounds.

( 3 ) THE trial court dismissed the suit as per its judgment and decree dated 26-3-70. The correctness of the said decree was challenged by the plaintiff in R. A. No. 274|1971 on the file of the Civil Judge, Gadag, which appeal came to be dismissed by the civil Judge as per his judgment dated 7-8-1963. Hence, this second appeal by the plaintiff.

( 4 ) SRI B. C. Sridharan, learned advocate appearing for the appellant, in the course of his arguments, confined himself only to the question of the plaintiff's entitlement for the refund of Rs. 1,000 paid by him on the date of the agreement.

( 5 ) IN v









Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top