SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1981 Supreme(Kar) 159

CHANDRASHEKARAIAH, N.VENKATACHALA
BYALAPPA – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF KARNATAKA – Respondent


VENKATACHALA, J.

( 1 ) BY consent of learned counsel, this appeal was treated as having been posted for hearing and we heard them. This appeal is from the order of bhimiah, J. , in W. P. No. 6512 of 1977 respondent-3 therein has presented this appeal. Since the petitioner therein died during the pendency of the writ petition, his legal representatives are arrayed as respondents 3 (a) to 3 (d) in this appeal. For the sake of convenience, the parties will hereinafter be referred to according to their respective positions in the writ petition.

( 2 ) RESPONDENT-3 had made two applications under S. 48-A of the Karnataka land Reforms Act, 1961 (hereinafter referred to as 'the Act') before the Land Tribunal, Bangalore North taluk (hereinafter referred to as 'the tribunal') seeking occupancy right in respec of 3 acres 1 gunta of land comprised in Sy. No. 4112 of Sasvegatta village, Bangalore North Taluk, belonging to the petitioner. Those applications were granted by the Tribunal by its order dated 18-6-75. That order was impugned in the writ petition from which the present appeal has arisen. There, the petitioner's grievance was that the Tribunal had made the order impugned therein withou







Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top