D.M.CHANDRASHEKHAR, N.VENKATACHALA
PARIJATHA – Appellant
Versus
KAMALAKSHA NAYAK – Respondent
( 1 ) THIS civil revision petition is before us on its reference to a Division Bench.
( 2 ) THE necessary and material facts are, briefly, these: Respondent 1 was the plaintiff in O. S. No. 442 of 1980, on the file of the Munsiff, Udupi. Respondents 2, 3, 4 and 5 were defendants 2,1, 3 and 4 respectively therein. In that suit, the plaintiff, inter alia, sought a permanent injunction to restrtain defendants 3 and 4 from granting an "exhibition Certificate" respecting the motion picture "ganda- bherunda" on the allegations that defendant No. 1 represented to the plaintiff that he (deft~l) had acquired the exclusive right to exhibit than film I'gandabherunda" in Dharwar district by virtue of the agreement dated 15. 1. 79 executed in his favour by defendant-2 and one Vajramuni; that the plaintiff, on the strength of that representation, entered into an agreement dated 5. 9. 80 with defendant 2 whereunder defendant-1 had to deliver to the plaintiff by 15. 12. 80 prints of the said film enabling the latter to exhibit the same in Dharwar district: and that since the plaintiff, subsequently, learnt of the advertisements in newspapers that a certain m. J. M. Productions and
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.