( 1 ) THESE tvo civil revision petitions arise out of the two suits being C. S, nos. 33 and 36 of 1981 respectively on the file of the learned Civil Judge. Yadagiri, and are preferred agains: a common order passed by the learned civil Judge on I. A. 2 filed in each, one cf the suits in question. I. A. 2 was filed by the petitioner under Order 38 rule 5 read with Section 151 of the cpc for an order of attachment before judgment of the claim amount payable by the United india General Insurance Co. Madras, branch at Raichur to M/s. Dhanalakshmi Trading Co. (defendant-1) in a sum of Rs. 8 lakhs in connection v/ith the fire accident at Raichur agriculture Produce Marketing and processing Centre, Cotton Kapas raichur.

( 2 ) BOTH the suits have been filed by the Stale Bank of Hyderabad, which is the petitioner in both these revision petitions. The prayer made in the application (I. A. 2) filed in both the suits is the same and the allegations made in the affidavits filed in support of the applications are also similar the trial Court, on consideration of. "he averments made in the affidavits filed in support of the applications, has held that no cose is made out for passing