SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1981 Supreme(Kar) 354

K.A.SWAMI
MOHAMMED,M. – Appellant
Versus
B. VASUMAL – Respondent


Advocates:
IQBAL AHMED

K. A. SWAMI, J.

( 1 ) THIS CP is filed by the appellant for permission to appeal as an indigent person. There is a delay of 89 days for preferring this petition. A notice WHS ordered on the application filed by the petitioner for condonation of delay in filing ihe Civil petition. As per the office note the respendent has refused to receive the notice ; therefore the Addl. Registrar, by the order dated 26th Nov. 1930 has held the revies as sufficient. Thereafter, the appiication came up for orders on 3-12-1989 and an order was dictated in that day condoning the delay in filing the Civil petition. Bat, before signing the order it was felt that the matter was required to be heard by a division Bench. Accerdingly the eass was ordered to be posted for ;being spoken to'. Hence, the case came up before the court on 8-12 1980 on which date it came to be adjourned on the request of the counsel fo 12-12 1980. Accordingly, on 12-12-1980 the learned counsel was heard on the question as to whether the matter was required to be beard by a Division Bench.

( 2 ) FOR the reasons fo be stated hereafter, I am of the visw thst the matter is required to be heard by a Division Bench therefore, I recall t







Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top