SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1982 Supreme(Kar) 69

G.N.SABHAHIT, K.BHIMIAH, N.D.VENKATESH
CHANDRAMOHAN – Appellant
Versus
FLORENCE – Respondent


Advocates:
B.RUDRA GOWDA, B.S.KESHAVA IYENGAR

SABHAHIT, J.

( 1 ) THIS arises out of a reference made by the Prl. Civil Judge, Shimoga, by his order dated 8. 9. 80 passed by him for dissolution of marriage in MC no. 21 of 1979, on his file.

( 2 ) CHANDRAMOHAN Kumar made a petition to the Court of the District jugde, Shimoga, for dissolution of his marriage with Florence Indravathi respondent-1 in thq petition, under s. 10 of the Indian Divorce, Act, 1869, (hereinafter referred to as 'the Act' ). He averred that his marriage with respondent-1 in the petition was soleminised on 18. 5. 78 according to Christian religious rites. After the marriage, he took resondent-1 to his residence on 21. 5. 78 Respondent-1 stayed with the petitioner for a week and, thereafter, she went to bommanahally to the house of her parents along with the petitioner. On 30. 5 78 in the night, the nuptial ceremony was arranged. But, according to the petitioner, respondent-1 did not cooperate with the petitioner for sexual intimacy. Even on the next day and on subsequent days, she put forward some excuse or the other and did not allow the petitioner any sexual intimacy with her. The petitioner stayed with respondent-1 for four days and returned to his house.











































Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top