SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1982 Supreme(Kar) 70

G.N.SABHAHIT
SHA BABULAL AND CO. – Appellant
Versus
B. NAGAPPA – Respondent


Advocates:
B.K.RAMACHANDRA RAO, C.R.Shivaswamy, R.GOPAL

G. N. SABHAHIT, J.

( 1 ) THIS appeal by the plaintiff is directed against the judgment and decree dated 19-3-1974 made by the Civil Judge, bellary in RA No. 9 of 1974 on his file, allowing the appeal on reversing the judg ment and decree dated 11-12-1973 passed by the Munsiff, Kudligi, in OS No. 28/70 on his file, decreeing the suit of the plaintiff.

( 2 ) THE plaintiff instituted a suit for recovery of Rs. 1,090 25 P. along with interest at 12% per annum. The plaintiff described himself as a joint family firm. Subsequently, however, by an amendment, the plaintiff was changed as a partnership act and the trial Court decreed the suit holding that the suit even after the amendment was not barred by time. The defendant took up the matter in appeal and the learned Civil Judge raised the following points as arising for his consideration in the appeal : (1) Whether the entries made in the day Book Ex. P 2 as in Exs. P 2 (a) and (b) are genuine ? (2) Whether the defendant is liable to pay the past interest at 12% per annum ? (3) Whether S. 21 of the Limitation act is applicable to the case after the amendment of the plaint on 21 11-1973 ? (4) What order ?

( 3 ) THE learned Civil Judge, reas










Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top