SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1982 Supreme(Kar) 185

P.A.KULKARNI
SADRODDIN IBRAHIM – Appellant
Versus
NARAYANA RAMACHANDRA – Respondent


Advocates:
K.I.BHATTA, N.A.MANDAGI

P. A. KULKARNI, J.

( 1 ) THE revision petition is directed against the order dt. Jan. 25, 1977, made by the District Judge, Belgaum, in H. R. C. Appeal No. 7 of 1975 allowing the appeal and setting aside the order of eviction made by the munsiff, Belgaum in H. R. C. No, 11977 of 1973.

( 2 ) THE landlord filed the petition under S. 21. (1) (d) (h) (k) and (l) of the Karnataka Rent Control Act. 1961 (hereinafter referred to as 'the rent Control Act') alleging that his son Mohamad Gous had studied upto 6th Standard and was unemployed. According to him, he intended to start some business so that his son Mohamad gous would look after the same and maintain himself. 'he intends to construct a building in the petition pre mises so as to enable his son to run the business. He cannot construct any building in the petition premises unless it is vacated by the tenant. Under these circumstances, he required the possession of the petition premises bona fide and reasonably for erecting a building so as to enable his son to run the shop. The petition premises had been let out to the tenan for running a fire wood depot; but the tenant has, started selling illicit liquor also. The tenant is a drunkar














Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top