SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1983 Supreme(Kar) 71

G.N.SABHAHIT
MADHUKAR DASO DESHPANDE – Appellant
Versus
ANANT NILKANDHA DESHPANDE – Respondent


Advocates:
Basavalingappa, K.S.Desai, Narendra Kumar Gunaki, W.K.JOSHI

G. N. SABHAHIT, J.

( 1 ) THIS appeal by defendant No. 4a is directed against the judgment and decree dt. 25-8-1980, passed by the I Addl. Civil judge, Belgaum, in R. A. No. 28/1980 on his file, dismissing the appeal as barred by time.

( 2 ) THE appeal was filed on 28-1-1980. Even taking into consideration the time taken for supplying the certified copies the appeal should have been filed on 25-1-1980 Therefore, there was a clear delay of three days in filing the appeal. There was no application for condonation of delay. Hence, the learned Civil Judge held that the appeal was barred by time and dismissed the appeal. It is against such judgment and decree that the present appeal is instituted.

( 3 ) THE learned counsel for the appellant strenuously urged before me that though the learned Civil Judge mentioned that there was delay of 25 days, in fact, there was delay of only three days. Such delay was inevitable, because, he had to come from Gokak to Belgaum to file the appeal. The certified copies were obtained by him on 25-10-1980 and the appeal was filed on 28-1-1980. So, he submitted that the short delay should have been condoned. He further submitted that since the office did not











Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top