SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1983 Supreme(Kar) 67

K.S.PUTTASWAMY
LAKSHMI AMMAL – Appellant
Versus
C. T. O,XIV CIRCLE BANGALORE – Respondent


Advocates:
K.SRINIVASAN INDRAJEETH SHAH, L.M.PANDURANASWAMY

K. S. PUTTASWAMY, J.

( 1 ) ONE K. Neejakanta Iyer of Bangalore who was carrying on business under the name and style of Rajkamal enterprises at No. 8/2, II Cross, gandhinagar, Bangalore-9 was a registered dealer under the Karnataka sales Tax Act, 1957 (Kar. Act 25 of 1957) (hereinafter referred to as the act) and the Central Sales Tax Act of 1956 (Act No. 74 of 1956) hereinafter referred to as the CST Act ). He died on 7. 2. 1975 leaving behind him his mother Lakshmi Ammal, petitioner No. 1, his wife Vijayalakshmi petitioner No. 2 and his daughter laksmi, petitioner No. 3 as his legal representatives.

( 2 ) WHEN Neelakanta Iyer was alive, he had been assessed to sales tax under the Act for the years 1965-66 to 1971-72 and for the years 1965-66 to 1967-68 under the CST Act and had been issued with demand notices for payment of taxes determined for the said years. On the non-payment of taxes, interests and penalties had been imposed and. coercive proceedings had been instituted against neelakanta Iyer. On the date of his death, neelakanta Iyer was due in a sum of rs. 85,074-00 as arrears of taxes and penalties to the State.

( 3 ) ON 6. 10. 1977 the Commercial tax Officer, XIV Circle,




























Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top