K.J.SHETTY, S.R.RAJASEKHARA MURTHY
S. N. GONDAKAR – Appellant
Versus
COMMR. OF COMMERCIAL TAXES – Respondent
( 1 ) THIS revision petition under Sec. 23 (1) of the Karnataka Sales Tax Act, 1957 (the Act) raises a narrow but not very easy point. The question raised for our consideration is whether the pickle jar or otherwise commonly called "bharani" falls under Entry 112 or entry 118 of the Second Schedule to the Act. For immediate reference we set out those two Entries below :"112. Chinaware, Porcelain ware and Stoneware other than those falling under any other entry eight per cent 118. Containers other than gunnies. Four per cent. "
( 2 ) THE petitioner is a dealer registered under thq provisions of the karnataka Sales Tax Act For the assessment year 1975-76 the petitinoer submitted the return of turnover declaring taxable turnover at Rs. 23,758-88 out of which the turnover of Rs. 19,938-68 pertains to sales of pickle jars. It was contended before the assessing authority that that turnover should be brought to tax at the rate of 4% under Entry 118. But the assesssing authority did not accept thalt contention. That turnover was taxed at 8% treating the pickle jars as Chinaware or Porcelainware under Entry 112. The petitioner preferred an appeal to the Assistant Com
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.