SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1984 Supreme(Kar) 52

P.A.KULKARNI
S. BANGARAPPA – Appellant
Versus
GANESH NARAYAN HEGDE – Respondent


Advocates:
C.SHIVAPPA, K.H.N.KHURANGA

P. A. KULKARNI, J.

( 1 ) THIS is a revision by the petitioner, who was the accused No. 1 in C. C. No. 2888/1983 pending on the file of the J. M,f. C, II Court Hubli city.

( 2 ) COMPLAINANT filed a complaint for the offence under S. 500 I. P. C. against the accused No. 1 who is said to have made an alleged defamatory statement and also against Accused nos. 2 and 3 who are the Printer and publisher and Editor of Samyukta karnataka Daily, published in Hubli the accused No. 1 is said to have called a Press Conference on 28th april, 1983 at Bangalore and is said to have made the alleged defamatory statement at that Press Conference. The said statement was published in various newspapers including samyukta Karnataka Daily published in Hubli. That Samyukta Karnataka Paper was published at hubli on 29-4-1983. The complainant feeling that the publication of the said statement said to have been made by the accused No. 1 amounted to an offence of defamation as defined by S 499 I. P. C. has filed a complaint in the Court of the j. M. F. C. II Court, Hubli.

( 3 ) THE learned Magistrate, issued process for the offence under s. 500 I. P. C. against the accused persons. While the matter was thus pe



















Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top