SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1984 Supreme(Kar) 81

N.D.VENKATESH
K. V. RUDRAIAH – Appellant
Versus
B. S. MUDDA GANGAMMA – Respondent


Advocates:
N.K.Gupta, R.B.SADASHIVAPPA

N. D. VENKATESH, J.

( 1 ) THE respondent is the wife of the petitioner. She obtained an order in C. M. C. No. 4/82 on the file of the J. M. F. C. , Gouribidanur under S. 125 of the Cr. P. C. for monthly maintenance at the rate of Rs. 200/ -.

( 2 ) SINCE the husband is said to have committed default in paying the monthly maintenance she has applied to the court under S. 125 (3) of the Code for recovery of the amounts due. By the impugned order, the learned Magistrate, overruling the objections of the husband, has directed attachment of the salary payable to the husband by the State Government. It may be noted that he is an employee under the State Government and is working as a Forest Guard in the Department of Forests.

( 3 ) SUB-SEC. (3) of S. 125 of the Code provides that "if the person concerned fails without sufficient cause to comply with the order" the Magistrate may"issue a warrant for levying the amount due in the manner provided for levying fines. . . . . "

( 4 ) THE levy of fine is provided for in S. 421 and the other allied provisions of the Code. S. 421 of the Code reads :"warrant for levy of fine; (1) When an offender has been sentenced to pay a fine, the Court passing th












Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top