SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1984 Supreme(Kar) 101

K.S.PUTTASWAMY
ROLLATAIRERS LTD. – Appellant
Versus
UNION OF INDIA – Respondent


Advocates:
ARSHAD HIDAYTULLAH, K.SHIVASHANKAR BHAT

( 1 ) M/s. Rollatainers Limited, a public limited Company incorporated under the companies Act, petitioner-1 which will be hereafter referred to as the petitioner is engaged in the manufacture and sale of 'printed cartons' at its two factories-one situated at Makali near Nelamangala of bangalore District and the other at Faridabad of Hariyana State. In this petition, we are concerned with the manufacture of 'printed cartons' at Makali factory only.

( 2 ) FOR the period from 1-3-1975 to 1-3-1983 the said manufactured goods were exigible to excise duty under Tariff item No. 68 of the Central Excise and sales Act of 1944 (Central Act No. 1 of 1944) (here inafter referred to as the act ). But. Government of India in exercise of the powers conferred on it by rule 8 (1) of the Central Excise Rules of 1944 (here inaftsr referred to as the Rules) made under the Act, by its notification No. 55 of 1975 dated 1-3-1975, amended from time to time, exempted various manufactured articles one of which was Item No. 13-"all produces of the printing industry including new papers and printed periodicals" from the whole of excise duty leviable thereon under the Act, Both sides are agreed that the said
























Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top