SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1984 Supreme(Kar) 182

A.K.LAXMESHWAR, G.N.SABHAHIT, S.R.RAJASEKHARA MURTHY
P. NIRMALA – Appellant
Versus
R. ANTHONY RAJ – Respondent


Advocates:
R.B.BRAHMAVAR

SABHAHIT, J.

( 1 ) THIS reference under S. 17 of the Divorce Act is by the III Addl. Judge, City Civil Court, Bangalore City, seeking for confirmation of the decree dt. 24-7-1981 passed by his predecessor, for dissolution of marriage, by his letter dt. 20-4-1982.

( 2 ) THE petitioner, Nirmala was married to the respondent R. Anthony Raj on 26-4-1967 at St. Joseph's Church, Mysore and according to her they lived together as husband and wife till 16-10-1977. They were last residing in Bangalore. A boy and a girl are born to her out of the wedlock. She has further averred that when the charm of married life faded, the respondent started illtreating her. She has particularly averred that she was illtreated by her husband during the months Oct. 1975, Dec. 1975, Mar. 1976 and Oct. 1977. She also averred in her petition that her husband committed sodomy on her and sought for dissolution of marriage.

( 3 ) THE husband remained absent during hearing. The petitioner filed an affidavit in proof of her allegations made in the petition; and the learned Presiding Officer relying on the averments in the affidavit proceeded to pass a decree as prayed for. He did not even observe that the decree wa












Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top