S.A.HAKEEM, K.J.SHETTY
ARUNACHALAM C. – Appellant
Versus
COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX – Respondent
( 2 ) THE facts, in brief, are these : i. T. R. Cs. Nos. 89 and 90/1976 : sri C. Arunachalam - the assessee was a partner in the firm of M/s Sunrise industries Syndicate representing his huf. His wife was also a partner in that firm. Sri C. Arunachalam was also a partner in that capacity in another firm called M/s. Sunrise Industries. There his minor children had been admitted to the benefits of tha partnership. For the assessment year 1971-72, Sri C. Arunachalam as an individual filed his return of income made of property income and refund of annuity deposit. The I. T. O. completed the assessment determining the assessee's total income at Rs. 12,368/- made up of property income of Rs. 10,643/- and refund of annuity deposit (other sources) of Rs. 1. 725/- in the status of an individual. For the assessment year 1972-73. I. T. O. made similar assessment accepting the return of the assessee. In both the
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.