SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1985 Supreme(Kar) 23

K.J.SHETTY, M.P.CHANDRAKANTARAJ
K. THAMMAIAH – Appellant
Versus
PAPANNA – Respondent


Advocates:
B.K.RAMACHANDRA RAO, CHANDRASEKARAN, GOPAL

( 1 ) THIS appeal of defendants is directed against the Judgment and Decree of the court of the Civil Judge at Manyya in o. S. No. 49/1971 on his life. The respondent in this appeal was the plaintiff and the appellants were the defendants. In the course of this order, we will refer to the parties by the rank assigned to them in the trial Court.

( 2 ) BRIEFLY stated the facts of the case are as follows : The plaintiff brought the suit for specific performance of the obligations of the defendants in accordance with the terms and conditions set out in Exhibit-Pi, the suit document and agreement to sell, dated July 8, 1971, certain agricultural land bearing S. No. 145/1 (Old No. 898) in Mandya (Kasba ). The extent of the land agreed to be sold r. 16 under Exhibit-Pi was 1 acre and 22 guntas for a consideration of Rs. 27,390/- and a sum of Rs 11,000/- was paid on the date of the agreemeni and the balance was to be paid before the Sub Registrar at the time of the execution and registration of the deed of sale. The plaintiff was required to have the property conveyed to him within three months from the date of the agreement on performing his part of the agreement and the defendants were r














Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top