M.P.CHANDRAKANTARAJ, K.J.SHETTY
KRISHNA REDDY H. P. – Appellant
Versus
CANARA BANK – Respondent
( 2 ) THE appellant was defendant against whom the respondent-Canara Bank (the "bank") instituted the suit for recovery of a sum of Rs. 23,940-97 with current interest at 13 per cent per annum on the following averments:- on June 19, 1969, the defendant availed of a loan of Rs. 15,500/- on the security of immoveable properties with the deposit of title deeds so as to create an equitable mortgage in favour of the bank. In order to ensure prompt repayment of the loan, the defendant also executed an On Demand Promissory Note for a sum of Rs. 15. 500/- in favour of the bank. On October 14, 1969, the defendant again availed of another loan of Rs. 10. 500/- by extending the said security and on executing another Promissory Note for a sum of Rs. 10,500/ -. The defendant also hypothecated his crops and live-stock by executing necessary agreements. In all, the defendant had taken Rs. 26. 000/- as loan from the Bank. The loan was not repaid as agreed upon and on March 31, 1972, the defendant was found due in a sum of rs. 23,940-97
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.