SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1985 Supreme(Kar) 89

M.P.CHANDRAKANTARAJ, K.J.SHETTY
KRISHNA REDDY H. P. – Appellant
Versus
CANARA BANK – Respondent


Advocates:
H.C.SHIVA KUMAR, H.LAKSHMANASWAMY

( 1 ) THIS appeal 1 as been preferred against the Decree and Judgment dated december 17, 1974, made by the additional Civil Judge, Bangalore, in o. S. No. 42/1972.

( 2 ) THE appellant was defendant against whom the respondent-Canara Bank (the "bank") instituted the suit for recovery of a sum of Rs. 23,940-97 with current interest at 13 per cent per annum on the following averments:- on June 19, 1969, the defendant availed of a loan of Rs. 15,500/- on the security of immoveable properties with the deposit of title deeds so as to create an equitable mortgage in favour of the bank. In order to ensure prompt repayment of the loan, the defendant also executed an On Demand Promissory Note for a sum of Rs. 15. 500/- in favour of the bank. On October 14, 1969, the defendant again availed of another loan of Rs. 10. 500/- by extending the said security and on executing another Promissory Note for a sum of Rs. 10,500/ -. The defendant also hypothecated his crops and live-stock by executing necessary agreements. In all, the defendant had taken Rs. 26. 000/- as loan from the Bank. The loan was not repaid as agreed upon and on March 31, 1972, the defendant was found due in a sum of rs. 23,940-97

Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top