K.J.SHETTY, M.P.CHANDRAKANTARAJ
SYNDICATE BANK – Appellant
Versus
I. K. AMITHA – Respondent
( 2 ) THE appellant Bank was the plaintiff in the suit. Suit was for a decree against the respondents in the sum of Rs. 1,15,210/- and for sale of the mortgaged suit schedule property of the defendants in the event of the defendants not depositing the amount decreed within the time specified. The suit came to be decreed only as against defendant-1, but it came to be dismissed as against defendants 2 to 9. Defendant-1 has been directed to pay the decretal amount within 3 months from the date of the decree failing which only the share of defendant-1 in the suit schedule mortgaged property is directed to be brought to sale to realise the amount. Aggrieved by the said judgment and decree in regard to failure to get a decree against all the defendants, the plaintiff Bank has preferred this appeal. Orginally the appeal was filed only making defendants 2 to 9 as respondents. Subsequently defendant-1 made an application to implead himself in this proceeding and he was permitted to implead himself as re
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.