( 1 ) THE petitioner an ex-employee of the kannataka State Road Transport Corporation has presented this petition questioning the legality of the order by which his services were terminated.

( 2 ) THE facts of the case in brief are as follows: By order dated 6-1-1983 the petitioner was taken as a badli conductor in the services of the Corporation. By the impugned order dated 3-12-1984 Annexure-A his services were terminated on payment of one month's salary in lieu of notice and 15 days wages as retrenchment compensation in terms of Section 25-F of the Industrial Disputes Act (the Act for short ). The petitioner questions the validity of the said order on the following grounds: mandatory conditions prescribed under Sec. 25-F namely assigning reasons for retrenchment and giving an intimation to the State Government have not been complied with. In my opinion the contention is untenable for the order of termination does not amount to retrenchment within the meaning of that expression as defined under Section 2 (oo) of the Industrial disputes Act, in view of the introduction of sub-clause (bb) into the said clause. In view of sub-clause (bb) which was introduced into the Act by Act