SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1985 Supreme(Kar) 147

Karnataka High Court
State of Karnataka - Appellant
Versus
Babu Poojary - Respondent
Decided On : 04-10-85
CrI.A. : 404 of 1982

Advocates:
H.S.Kempanna, K.H.N.KHURANGA, M.GOPALKRISHNA SHETTY

Headnote:Indian Penal Code, 1860, Sections 302/34 and Sections 448/323/324 - Three accused (Babu, Sadashiva and Kanda) acquitted of the charges - Criminal Procedure Code, 1973 -Section 378(1) - Appeal against the order of acquittal by the State - Re-appreciation of evidence - P.Ws. fairly independent and no reason to disbelieve their evidence - Assaulting the deceased by means of knives undoubtful - Recovery of the blood-stained knives corroborates the evidence regarding dying declaration statement - complicity of Babu and Sadashiva (respondents) in the commission of offences proved - Possibility of the deceased implicating Kamla (respondent) subsequently not ruled out - Injuries indicted not on vital parts of the body - Intention to cause death: of the deceased absent – Effect - Offence committed under - Sections 448/324 read with Section 34Acquittal of Kamla confirmed whereas other two respondents sentenced to pay a fine. (Paras 1, 9, 12, 13 and 16)

       

( 1 ) THE State has filed this appeal questioning the legality and correctness of the judgement and order of acquittal dated may 26, 1982 passed by the Addl. Sessions Judge, Dakshina Kannada, in sessions Case No. 3 of 1982 acquitting the respondents - A-1 to A3 of the charge of the offence of murder punishable under section 302 I. P. C. , read with Section 34 i. P. C. as also of the charge of the offences punishable under Sections 448, 323 and 324 I. P. C. , as levelled against them.

( 2 ) ONE Aiyappa Poojary of Surlimoole in vittal Kasaba village, Bantwal Taluk. Dakshina Kannada District, is the deceased. A-3 Smt. Kamala is his wife. A-2 sadashiva is his son, i. e. , A-3's sister,s daughter is given in marriage to the nephew of A-1. The deceased was suspecting fidelity of A-3, his wife, and that had given cause for the difference between him and A-3. He was living all alone separately in a house situated in the Dark- hast land allotted to him by the Government. He had erected a small house covered by thatched roof. The house was surrounded by dwarf walls on three sides with a thattiwali on the other side with a thatti door. He used to work as a cooly and make his living. On September 27, 1981 when he returne'd back to his house in the evening, he found his steel trunk containing clothes and other utensils was missing. He suspected the hand of A-3 and went to the house where she was putting up with A-2 and abused her and returned back to his house. When he was sleeping there in the hut, it is the prosecution case, at about 11 or 11-30 P. M. , the three accused broke open the thatti wall and, having trespassed into the house, started assaulting the deceased - A-1 and A-2 assaulted him with knives and A-3 assaulted him with hands. She gave fist-blows on the chest and abdomen. The deceased, having sustained injuries, kept himself lying pretending to have died and the accused, thereafter, left the house. The deceased, thereafter, almost naked with a loin-cloth, went With injuries on his person to the house of P. W. I. Ismail beary and woke him up and informed him about what had happened. He told him that his son Sadashiva and Babu Poojary had assaulted him by means of Knives. P. W. 1. Ismail Beary then went to the house of P. W. 2 Veerappa Poojary, uncle of the deceased, and told him about what had happened and returned back. As p. W. 2 was near the deceased, he went to bring an autorickshaw. When questioned by P. W. 2 Veerappa Poojary, the deceased told before him also that Babu poojary and Sadashiva as also his wife kamala had assaulted him. When P. W. 1 returned with an autorickshaw driven by p. W. 3 Thimmappa Shetty, P. W. 1 and 2 together took the deceased in the autorickshaw to the Primary Health Centre at vittal. P. W. 11 Dr. Nanjaiah, who was on duty in the hospital, examined and found that the deceased had sustained 15 injuries as follows :-"2. No. 1. An incised wound on the medical aspect of the right foot, size 2 cm bleeding plus, plus plus. Depth could not be made out. No. 2. Two incised wounds situated below the left knee in the interior aspect, size about 2 cm in length situated 2 cm apart with each other, bleeding plus plus superficial. No. 4. An incised wound situated on the middle of the lateral aspect of the left arm size about 2 cm gaping by point 5 cm, bleeding plus plus, depth was about 5 cm. No. 5. A contusion on the posterior aspect of the left wrist, size 5 cm x 3 cm, skin was bruised on the middle of the contusion. No. 6. A contusion on the left clavical, size about 7 x 2 cm, the skin was bruised on the contusion. No.-7. An incised wound situated on the lateral aspect of the left arm 5 cm above the elbow joint, size 1 cm in length bleeding plus plus superficial. No. 8. An abrasion on the posterior aspect of the left elbow, size 3 x 5 cm. No. 9. There were three "abrasions one below the other on the anterior aspect of the left fore leg, size 3 x 2 cm each. No. 10. An incised wound about 2 cm in length horiz


















Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
Judicial Analysis

SupremeToday

SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top