SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1985 Supreme(Kar) 187

M.RAMA JOIS
SRIKANTH RAO – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF KARNATAKA – Respondent


Advocates:
K.SUBBA RAO, N.DEVDAS, S.G.SUNDARA SWAMY

M. RAMA JOIS, J.

( 1 ) THE petitioner has presented this writ petition praying for quashing the order of the State Government refusing to refer the dispute between him and the r. 38. Management of K. Devappa Naik and sons about the imposition of penalty of dismissal from service against the petitioner for industrial adjudication.

( 2 ) THE petition has come up for preliminary hearing after notice to the respondents. By consent of counsel appearing for the parties, it is taken up for final hearing.

( 3 ) THE facts of the case in brief are as follows : The petitioner was a Conductor in a Motor Transport Undertaking of the third respondent. A charge sheet dated 10-6-1982 was issued to the petitioner alleging that on 8-6-1982 he allowed some passengers travelling in bus No. MEG 4462 from Manipal to mangalore to get down at Hampanakatta but did not allow two others to do so and then he had also misbehaved with a passenger. The third respondent appointed an Enquiry Officer to enquire into the charges levelled against thepetitioner. In the enquiry, the petitioner was found guilty of the charges. By order dated 20. 11. 1982 (Annexure-A), the petitioner was dismissed from service. The petiti










Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top