SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1985 Supreme(Kar) 331

M.N.VENKATACHALIAH, D.R.VITHAL RAO
PATEL EXHIBITORS (P) LTD – Appellant
Versus
CORPORATION OF THE CITY OF BANGALORE – Respondent


Advocates:
H.B.DATAR, R.V.VASANTH KUMAR

VENKATACHALIAH J.

( 1 ) THIS appeal is by the plaintiff and is directed against the order dated 31-8- 1985 on I A. I. in O. S, No. 2724 of 1985 on the file of the XI Add1. Civil Judge, bangalore City, declining an interlocutory injunction restraining dis-possession.

( 2 ) M/s. Patil Exhibitors (Pvt.) Ltd. , appellant, was lessee of the Municipal corporation of Bangalore-respondent, respecting the plaint schedule property, viz. , a Cinema-house located in the Public Utility Building on the M. G. Road, bangalore, under a deed of lease dated 31. 10. 1981 The term of the lease came to an end, by efflux of time, on the expiry of 31. 8 1985. Even before the expiry of the term under the lease, appellant brought the present suit for specific enforcement of an alleged agreement to renew the lease said to be contained in Clause 27 of the said deed dated 31. 10 1981. In the suit. Appellant filed I. A. I, under Order 39 Rules 1 and 2 CPC for an interlocutory possessory remedy of a temporary injunction restraining Respondent-lessor from interfering with the plaintiff's possession of the cinema- house.

( 3 ) THE appeal is in the list of admission cases for the day. Sri R. V. Vasantha Kumar, lear














Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top