SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1985 Supreme(Kar) 395

N.D.VENKATESH
STATE OF KARNATAKA – Appellant
Versus
APPAIAH LAXMINARAYANA – Respondent


Advocates:
G.Gangi Reddy, K.H.N.KHURANGA

N. D. VENKATESH, J.

( 1 ) THIS revision is by the state. It is directed against the order dated 21-7-1983 of the JMFC, Chintamani in C C. 337 and 338/81 on his file. By that order he has discharged the respondent who was the accused in the case.

( 2 ) THE court below had initiated the said proceeding against the respondent on the report (charge sheet) laid by the Chintamani Police against him with the allegation that in his dealings in edible oil seeds he had violated the provisions of the Karnataka Edible Oil- seeds Dealers Licensing Order, 1977 (the order) and thereby had committed an offence punishable under S 7 of the essential Commodities Act, 1955 (E. G. Act ).

( 3 ) THE court below has discharged the accused mainly on two grounds. The first ground is that the police had no powers to investigate into any alleged offence under the Act at all and that power is only vested in the officers authorised by the State Government under clause 17 of the Order. The second ground is, that even otherwise, in the matter of the search and seizure of the essential commodity in question, the c. P C. had not complied with Sec. 165 and the other relevant provisions of the cr P. C. , and therefore









Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top