N. VENKATACHALA, J.

( 1 ) ORDERS made by some of the Land tribunals constituted under the Karnata land Reforms Act, 1961 (hereinafter referred to as 'the Principal Act'), have been impugned in these Writ Hetitions.

( 2 ) THE order impugned in W. P. FR. 18102/85 (LR) is the one made under section 48-C of the Principal Act, while the order impugned in W. P. FR. 18065/15 (LR) is another, made under Section 67 of that Act. The other orders impugned in the remaining writ petitions are those, made under Section 48-H of the said Act.

( 3 ) THE Registry of this Court has refused to register the said write petititions. That refusal of the Registry is based on its view that a remedy by way of appeal against eoch of the impugned orders, when has been made available to a party aggrieved thereby, under the Karnataka land Reforms (Amendment) Ordinance, 1985 (hereinafter referred to as 'the Ordinance'), which has come into force on december 6, 1985, that remedy should be regarded as a thresh-hold bar to a person who seeks to invoke the discretionary write jurisdiction of this Court under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of india to obtain relief respecting such order. Learned Counsel appea

Click Here to Read the rest of this document