SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1986 Supreme(Kar) 46

M.P.CHANDRAKANTARAJ
K. MOHAMMED HASHIM – Appellant
Versus
KARNATAKA STATE TRANSPORT APPELLATE TRIBUNAL – Respondent


M. P. CHANDRAKANTARAJ, J.

( 1 ) THE brief facts necessary for disposing of this long pending writ petition are as follows : The petitioner was an existing stage carriage operator on the inter-State route Tumkur to Hindupur via Beladhara, Koratagere, Madhugiri, kodigenahally and Muddenahalli gate and back. That permit was valid for one round trip. In the year 1976 the state of Karnataka and the State of andhra Pradesh entered into an agreement as provided for in Sec. 63 (3) (A) of the MOTOR VEHICLES ACT, 1939, 1939, (hereinafter referred to as the Act ). In that agreement for the aforementioned route the two round trips were agreed upon between the States. In the light of that agreement coming into force between the two States, the petitioner made en application under sub-sec. (8) of Sec. 57 of the Act for variation of the conditions of his permit by increasing the number of trips i. e. , by adding one more round trip. That application is dated 8-1-1976. Similarly, some of the respondents herein also made applications for grant of a fresh permit on the same route or somewhat similar route. One of them had a different route. All the applications were clubbed together by the 2nd respon







Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top