SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1986 Supreme(Kar) 104

M.S.PATIL
RUDRAMMA – Appellant
Versus
H. R. PUTTAVEERABHADRAPPA – Respondent


M. S. PATIL, J.

( 1 ) THE petitioner who claims to be legally wedded wife of the respondent has filed this petition being aggrieved by the order dt. 25-10-1982 passed by the J. M. F. C. , Gowribidanur, in C. M. C. No. 2/82, whereby he has dismissed the application made by the petitioner under S. 125 of the Cr. P. C. as not maintainable.

( 2 ) THE petitioner made that application under S. 125 Cr. P. C. claiming maintenance at the rate of Rs. 500/- per month from the respondent contending, inter alia, although the respondent married her at Gowribidanur of 29-8-1980 in accordance with the Hindu Marriage Customs and Rites and she also lived with him for one year as his legally wedded wife in his house at Hulikunte, but later on for no fault of her he started illtreating her and at last deserted her without any sufficient cause and despite issue of legal notice to him to take her back, he had failed to do so and refused to provide maintenance to her and that she had no other source or means for her maintenance. The respondent who contested the application not only denied that there was any such marriage between him and the petitioner, but also contended that the parents of the petitioner















Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top