SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1986 Supreme(Kar) 134

P.A.KULKARNI
MADAPPA – Appellant
Versus
LINGAPPA – Respondent


P. A. KULKARNI, J.

( 1 ) CIVIL Revision Petition No. 75 of 1981 by the petitioner is directed against the order dated 20-11-1980 passed by the Munsiff, Mandya, in Misc. No. 57 of 1976 filed under Sec. 47 C. P. C. dismissing the same. Regular Second Appeal No. 363 of 1981 by the defendant is directed against the judgment and decree dated 9-1-1981 passed by the Civil Judge. Mandya, in r. A. No. 320/76 confirming the judgment and decree dated 4-11-1976 passed by the Additional Munsiff, Mandya, in o. S. No. 126 of 1975 decreeing the plaintiff's suit.

( 2 ) THE revision petitioner in C. R. P. No. 75 of 1981 is the appellant in the second appeal. He has been referred to as the petitioner throughout in the course of this judgment. Respondent-1 Lingappa in Misc. No. 57 of 1976 is respondent-1 in the second appeal. Respondant-2 Basavaiah in misc. No. 57 of 1976 is also respondent-2 in the second appeal. The said basavaiah has died and his legal representatives have come on record. They are referred to as respondents-1 and 2 in the course of this order.

( 3 ) BOTH these cases are disposed of by a common judgment as the substantial question involved in both the cases is the same.

( 4 ) RESPOND
































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top