MURALIDHARA RAO
ULHAS NATURE CURE CENTRE, BANGALORE – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF KARNATAKA – Respondent
( 1 ) W. P. 14274/ 1986 : Petitioner is a registered partnership firm; it is asserted that it is running a Nature Cure Clinic at Yamunabai Road, Madhavnagar, Bangalore. It is said that it is registered under the Companies Act and is assessed for professional tax. Its function, as claimed in the petition, is to solve health problems by nature care without drug or surgery. It has the facility of steam bath, massaging and yogas. Petitioner's grievance is as follows :"the respondents are sending Policemen regularly to the institute of the petitioner and the posting of the Policemen at the institute of the petitioner is preventing the registered patients of the petitioner from taking treatment. By illegal acts and surveillance of the respondents and their officers the business of the petitioner is affected very much and if the same is continued by the respondents, the petitioner will be forced to close down the business. The acts of the respondents violate the guaranteed fundamental rights of the petitioner under Arts. 14, 19 (1) (g) and 21 of the Constitution of India. "again in para 'j' it is averred thus :the posting of the two policemen at the premises of the peti
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.