SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1987 Supreme(Kar) 189

K.A.SWAMI, P.P.BOPANNA
PAPANNA – Appellant
Versus
H. DODDE GOWDA – Respondent


Advocates:
SINHA, U.L.NARAYANA RAO

SWAMI, J.

( 1 ) ON 10-7-1987 an order was passed stating that no further orders were necessary. However, having regard to the submission made on both sides that this is an appeal in which further orders are required to be passed, we call the order dated 10-7-1987.

( 2 ) THERE is a request made by the learned Civil Judge C. J. M. Mandya for sending the entire records of this appeal along with the records of O. S. No. 1/1979 on the file of the District Judge, Mandya, out of which the appeal in' question arises,

( 3 ) R. A. No. 107/1979 is pen ing before the learned Civil Judge, Mandya to whom some- of tne parties to this appeal are also said to be parties. The aforesaid records are requested to be sent on the ground that tne same are required in the aforesaid R. A. No. 107/ 1979 pending on the file of the Civil judge, Ma -dya. It is also submitted by the appellants before us that the subject matter of the appeal before us is somewhat connected with the subject matter in the appeal in R. A. No. 107/1979 pending on the file of the C vil Judge and c. J. M. Mandya.

( 4 ) HOWEVER what disturbs us is the request made by the learned Civil Judge to send all the records of this appeal (RFA 109





Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top