SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1987 Supreme(Kar) 232

P.P.BOPANNA, K.A.SWAMI
STATE OF KARNATAKA – Appellant
Versus
COIMBATORE PREMIER CONSTRUCTIONS – Respondent


Advocates:
K.N.Haridasan Nambiar, V.G.Sabhahit

K. A. SWAMI, J.

( 1 ) R. F. A. No. 14/1978 is filed by the plaintiff and R. F. A. No. 48/1976 is filed by the defendants. In this judgment, the parties will be referred to with reference to the position assigned to them in the trial court. As both the appeals arise out of the same suit, they are disposed of by this common judgment.

( 2 ) O. S. No. 94/1972 was filed by the plaintiff for recovery of a sum of Rs. 48,409-06 being the amount due towards the work contract entrusted to it under ex. P. 10. The case of the plaintiff is that the defendants illegally terminated the contract and illegally forfeited the earnest money deposit and also failed to pay the amount towards the work done under the contract Ex. P. 10. Therefore, under all the heads together, the plaintiff prayed for a decree for recovery of the aforesaid sum.

( 3 ) THE defendants disputed the claim made by the plaintiff and contended that the contract was terminated in accordance with the provisions contained therein ; that the plaintiff failed to perform the contract within the time stipulated in the contract ; therefore the work was got done through the department and as well as by the other contractor. The defendants



Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top