SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1987 Supreme(Kar) 215

P.A.KULKARNI
D. S. DEVASHETTY – Appellant
Versus
PARVATHI – Respondent


Advocates:
N.P.Moganna, Shivaprakash

KULKARNI, J. ,, J.

( 1 ) BOTH the advocates submitted that the revision may be heard finally on merits itself. Accordingly arguments on the final merits of the revision are heard and it is disposed of.

( 2 ) THIS is a revision by defendant No. 1-appellant against the order dated 25-8-86 passed by the Civil Judge, kodagu, Madikeri'in unnumbered R. A. of 1985, directing the appellant to pay the court-fee on the amount that had fallen due from the date of the suit till the drawing up of the decree.

( 3 ) RESPONDENT No. 1 is the wife of the appellant. Respondents 2 to 4 are the children of appellant and respondent no. 1. Respondents filed a suit claiming maintenance at the rate of Rs. 500/- per month from the date of the suit. The respondents valued the suit under S. 22 (a) of the Court-Fees Act. Thus, for the purposes of court-fee, they valued the suit at Rs. 6000/- and paid the court-fee thereon.

( 4 ) THE trial court awarded maintenance at Rs. 500/- per month to the respondents from the date of suit onwards. The defendant-appellant being aggrieved by the said award of maintenance from the date of suit, prefered the appeal. The appellant valued the claim at Rs. 6000/- for the purposes







Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top