SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1987 Supreme(Kar) 390

Karnataka High Court
Sonakka - Appellant
Versus
U.R.Anantha Murthy - Respondent
Decided On : 12-02-87

Headnote:

The court held that the novel and film based on the life of a deceased politician were defamatory of the politician's family and granted an injunction restraining the defendants from publishing or exhibiting the novel and film.

Fact of the Case:

The plaintiffs, the widow and children of a deceased politician, filed a suit against the defendants, the author of a novel and the producers of a film based on the novel, alleging that the novel and film were defamatory of the politician and his family. The trial court dismissed the plaintiffs' application for an interlocutory injunction, finding that there was no prima facie case of defamation.

Finding of the Court:

The court found that the novel and film were based on the life of the politician and that there were several similarities between the characters in the novel and film and the politician and his family. The court also found that the novel and film contained defamatory statements about the politician and his family, including allegations that the politician was a womanizer and that his wife was a stingy and unloving woman. The court held that these statements were defamatory and that the plaintiffs had a prima facie case of defamation.

Issues: Whether the novel and film were defamatory of the politician and his family.

Ratio Decidendi: The court held that the novel and film were defamatory of the politician and his family because they contained statements that were false and damaging to their reputation. The court found that the statements in the novel and film were likely to lower the plaintiffs in the estimation of right-thinking members of society and that they would cause the plaintiffs to be held up to ridicule and contempt.

Final Decision: The court allowed the appeal and set aside the order of the trial court. The court granted an injunction restraining the defendants from publishing or exhibiting the novel and film for a period of 2 months.

P. P. BOPANNA, J.

( 1 ) THIS appeal is directed against the interlocutory order made by the learned Civil Judge in O. S. No. 4029 of 1987 dismissing the application filed by the plaintiffs (who are appellants herein and who are hereinafter referred to as the plaintiffs) under the provisions of O. 39 Rr. 1 and 2 of C. P. C. (in short the Code ).

( 2 ) INTERIM reliefs sought for by the plaintiffs in the suit were to restrain defendants-1, 2 and 3 from re-publishing the Kannada novel written by defendant-1 under the title "avasthe" and to restrain defendants - 4 to 8 from exhibiting and screening the picture based on the aforesaid novel going by the name "avasthe". It is common ground that the book was published earlier in the year 1978 and it has reached the stage of second reprint obviously because the book must have been in good demand by the lovers of Kannada Literature in this State. Defendant-1 who has written the book is a well-known litterateur and he has got to his credit some other works in Kannada language. It is also on record that his novel 'samskara' was considered to be a 'classic' in Kannada literature and it has been translated in various foreign languages. The fact that he is a person of very high attainments is established by the fact that he is now the Vice-Chancellor of Gandhi University, Kottayam, Kerala State. It is also not in dispute that defendant-1 was a close friend of one late Gopala Gowda who between the years 1950 and 1970 had made a mark as a politician of unquestionable integrity and strong political convictions. He appears to have taken a very active part in the social and political life in this State and participated in a Satyagraha known as Kagodu Satyagraha' in his native village to champion the cause of tenants in Shimoga District as against the landlords who according to him were coming in the way of the betterment of the conditions of tenants. He was also a member of the then Mysore Legislative Assembly in the year 1952 and a leader of the opposition in the then Mysore Legislative Assembly. He was the President of the socialist party, Karnataka Unit between 1965 and 1967 and he became the Chairman of the All India Parliamentary Board of the Socialist Party in the year 1967. He was returned to the Mysore Legislative Assembly both in the years 1962 and 1967 from the Thirthahalli Constituency. In 1970-71 he was the President of the Karnataka Samyuktha Vidhayaka Dal which was a federation of all the opposition parties in the State. It is mentioned in the plaint that late Gopala Gowda was a well-known freedom fighter and he was the unquestioned leader of the working class in Karnataka and he was instrumental in bringing about revolutionary changes to secure ownership rights to the actual cultivators of the land; that he was a 'fire brand opposition leader who led an uncompromising life and was especially feared by the Treasury Benches in the Karnataka Legislative Assembly. He was widely respected by one and all and especially those who were at the helm of affairs during his public life; that he was a firm believer in Socialist ideals and was close associate of late. Dr. Ram Manohar Lohia who championed the cause of the down-trodden in this country.

( 3 ) ACCORDING to the plaintiffs, late Gopala Gowda had led a very clean life and was an affectionate husband to the 1st plaintiff and never violated the sanctity of the matrimonial life. His life and character were above reproach both as the head of the family and also a politician and his relationship with his wife and children was not strained at any point of time. He also had a healthy and peaceful life till he suffered a paralytic stroke in about the second week of January 1972 at Victoria Hospital and passed away very soon thereafter. The 1st defendant who had admitted in the written statement that he was a close associate of late Gopala Gowda authored a novel, as noticed earlier in the year 1978 called "avasthe" which has given rise to this dis








































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
Judicial Analysis

AI

SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top