SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1988 Supreme(Kar) 38

K.S.BHATT, P.C.JAIN
H. S. PRAKASH – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF KARNATAKA – Respondent


Advocates:
CHANDRASEKHARAIAH, H.K.Vasudeva Reddy, K.SUBBA RAO

SHIVASHANKAR BHAT, J.

( 1 ) WRIT Appeal is by respondents 3 to 4 in the writ petition fifed by M/s. H. Abdul rahim and H. H. Devaraj. They challenged the State Government's notification dated 22-8-1987 purportedly exercised under Sec. 42 (12) of the Karnataka municipalities Act, 1964 ('the Act' for short), appointing the appellants to perform all the duties and exercise all the powers of president and Vice-President of City municipal Council, Hassan, respectively till 31-12-1987 (This period is stated to have been, now extended till the end of august, 1988 ). The writ petitioners also sought a direction to respondents 1 and 2 to hold the elections to elect President and Vice-President, under the relevant provisions of the Act and the Rules. The writ petition was allowed by the learned single Judge. Hence this appeal.

( 2 ) THE relevant facts, stated in the order of the learned single Judge may be repeated once again, since they represent the undisputed facts ;"the 1st petitioner is the Municipal councillor of Hassan City Municipal council. The 2nd petitioner is also the municipal Councillor of the very same council and both of them were elected as Municipal Councillors in the gener
















Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top