H.G.BALAKRISHNA
YASHODARA KADAMBA – Appellant
Versus
K. S. T. A. T. – Respondent
( 1 ) IN this writ petition, the petitioner has questioned the resolution passed by the 2nd respondent in Subject No. 173/ 87-88 dated 16-1-1988 (vide Annexure 'a') and also the order of 1st respondent passed in URA No. 98/1988 dated 4-3- 1988 (vide Annexure 'b') and sought the issue of a writ of certiorari for quashing annexures 'a' and 'b' and further for a mandamus directing 2nd respondent to grant replacement of the vehicle as prayed for by the petitioner.
( 2 ) THE facts of the case are as follows: The petitioner is the holder of a stage carriage permit authorised to operate on the route Mangalore to Malleshwara and by vehicle bearing No. CTA 9878 of 1987 model having a seating capacity of 48+2 + 10. Thereafter, the petitioner acquired a vehicle bearing No. CR X 9877 which is also of 1987 model vehicle having a seating capacity of 32 + 2+7 (Mitsubishi ). The petitioner applied on 6-1-1988 for replacement of the present vehicle of 1987 model to subserve public interest.
( 3 ) THE 2nd respondent vide resolution dated : 16th January, 1988 in Subject no. 173/87-88 rejected the application vide Annexure 'a'. The petitioner preferred an appeal before the 1st responde
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.