SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1988 Supreme(Kar) 231

S.A.HAKEEM, S.RAJENDRA BABU
COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX, KARNATAKA-I, BANGALORE – Appellant
Versus
M. D. VEERANARASIMHAIAH – Respondent


Advocates:
G.Sarangan, H.RAGHAVENDRA RAO, K.SRINIVASAN INDRAJEETH SHAH

RAJENDRA BABU, J.

( 1 ) THE Income-Tax Appellate Tribunal, bangalore Bench, Bangalore, has referred at the instance of the Department, the following question under Section 256 (1) of the Income-Tax Act, 1961 (hereinafter referred to as the Act) for the opinion of this Court :"whether, on the facts and in the circumstances of the case, the I. T. A. T. is right in holding that the provisions of Section 64 (1) (vii) do not apply in the present case ? "

( 2 ) THE assessee in this reference is an individual. M/s D. L. Narasimhaiah family Trust and M/s. M. D. Veeranarasimhaiah family Trust are partners in the registered firms of M/s. Jaya and Co. , and m/s. D. L. Narasimhaiah and Brothers. D L. Narasimhaiah is the other partner in the firm M/s. D L. Narasimhiah and Brothers while M. D. Venkatanarasimhiah is the other partner in the firm M/s. Jaya and Co. In the D. L. Narasimhaiah Family Trust the beneficiaries are the 5 minor children of the said Narasimhaiah represented by their mother, trustee in the firm of M/s. Jaya and Co. Similarly in the Veeranarasimhiah trust the 3 minor children of veeranarasimhiah are represented by their mother as the trustee in the registered firm of Narasimhi













Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top