SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1988 Supreme(Kar) 208

S.RAJENDRA BABU, S.A.HAKEEM
STATE BANK OF MYSORE – Appellant
Versus
COMMISSIONER OF I. T, KARNATAKA-L, BANGALORE – Respondent


Advocates:
G.Sarangan, H.RAGHAVENDRA RAO, K.SRINIVASAN INDRAJEETH SHAH

RAJENDRA BABU, J.

( 1 ) THE assessee is a Banking Company. The assessee filed return for the year 1976 77 admitting the chargeable interest of Rs. 10,17,25,410/ -. The assessee claimed that re-discount charges paid of rs. 36. 40. 206/- and interest earned on overdue bills of Rs. 84,77. 124/- should not be taxed. The I. T. O. rejected both these claims and brought the two sums to tax. On appeal the A. A. C. confirmed the said order. On further appeal, the Tribunal held that in respect of the rediscount, the assessee was entitled to a deduction, but on the other question agreed with the A. A C. that the interest is charged for the user of the funds beyond the stipulated time and the transaction results in earning of interest within the meaning of Sec. 2 (7) of the Interest tax Act and upheld assessment on this item.

( 2 ) THREE questions have been referred by the Tribunal for our opinion and they are :1. Whether on the facts and circumstances of the case, the overdue interest on the Demand Bills is interest within the meaning of Sec. 2 (7) of the Interest tax Act ? 2. Whether on the facts and in the circumstances of the case, the ITAT was right in holding that the contention of the a






Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top