SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1988 Supreme(Kar) 510

K.RAMACHANDRIAH
VENKATARAMAIAH S. – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF KARNATAKA BY PANDAVAPURA POLICE – Respondent


Advocates:
P.MATARAJAN

K. RAMACHANDRIAH, J.

( 1 ) 1. The short point that tails for determination in this Revision Petition is : whether the utterance of the words by the petitioner to one S. Jayarama Rao (P. W. 3 ). within the meeting hall of the land Tribunal, Pandavapura, in the course of the proceedings of the Land Tribunal, amounts to the offence of public nuisance punishable under Section 290 I. P. C.

( 2 ) IT has arisen in this way : petitioner is the younger brother of p. W. 3 S. Jayarama Rao. It appears there was a case between them before the Land Tribunal, Pandavapura. It had been posted for hearing on 15-11-1984. In the said case, petitioner was being cross examined by P. W. 3. Being irritated and upset by certain questions put by P. W. 3 to the petitioner, petitioner appears to have uttered the words "a^i, isid. an ;?=; sire 33ft ose*,' isfe" and those words were obviously directed to P. W. 3 and not to anybody else and while uttering those words, the petitioner appears to have misbehaved. 11 respect of that incident, a petty case charge-sheet was by Pandavapura Police against the petitioner in the Court of the Addl. Munsiff and JMFC, Srirangapatna, in C. C. No. 865/84 The statement of accusa








Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top