SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1989 Supreme(Kar) 40

H.G.BALAKRISHNA
SHYAMALA C. S – Appellant
Versus
C. S. SRIKANTAIAH – Respondent


Advocates:
Basavaraja Belavangala, VEDAVYASACHAR

BALAKRISHNA, J.

( 1 ) THIS is a petition filed by the wife of the respondent under Section 24 c. P. C. for transfer of suit O. S. No. 96/86 which is pending on the file of the additional Civil Judge, Tumkur, to the family Court, Bangalore.

( 2 ) THE facts in brief are as follows: the petitioner is stated to be the legally wedded wife of the respondent and soon after the marriage, differences arose between respondent and petitioner wife resulting in institution of M. C. 1/85 on the file of the Principal Civil Judge and c J M. , Tumkur. The marriaga was celebrated in Tumkur only and it is not disputed that the last place of residence of the couple is Tumkur. Various contentions were raised before the Principal civil Judge and C. J M,, Tumkur, by the respondent and the decree for restitution of conjngal rights was passed by the Court after trial. It is state that no appeal was preferred and the order became final. According to the petitioner she is now residing along with her brother since her father is not capable of maintaining her and that the respondent is residing at Mysore. Both the parties have engaged counsel from Bangalore to prosecute the respective cases at Tumkur. The grie













Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top