SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1989 Supreme(Kar) 90

P.K.SHYAMSUNDAR
NAGABHUSHAPPA V. – Appellant
Versus
DEPUTY COMMISSIONER, BELLARY DIST. – Respondent


Advocates:
H.Kantharaj, N.Y.HANUMANTHAPPA

SHYAMSUNDAR, J.

( 1 ) THE petitioner is not merely a member but the Vice-President of the Agricultural produce Marketing Committee, Bellary and seeks herein to challenge an order made by the Deputy Commissioner, bellary on the 13th April, 1987 as per annexure-C herein declaring that he is disqualified to be a member of the a P M. C. under S 16 (2) (g) read with s. 17 (2) of the Karnataka Agricultural produce Marketing (Regulation) Act, 1966 ('the Act' for short ).

( 2 ) HE has obtained an interim order on this court staying the impugned disqualification. Subsequently one Kehsava reddy said to be the President of the agricultural Produce Committee (herein- after called 'the committee') got himself impleaded as party alongside the Deputy commissioner of Bellary who alone was party respondent initially. However, the matter has been exclusively contested by r-1, the Deputy Commissioner followed by the other members of the committee of management of the said institution who had sought to intervene alleging that the petitioner and second respondent are hand-in-glove with each other and that respondent No. 2 while making a pretence of opposing the petition is likely to support the petitio












Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top