SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1989 Supreme(Kar) 325

M.RAMAKRISHNA RAO, M.RAMA JOIS
GAJANAN SAMBARAO GUNJIKAR – Appellant
Versus
VISHWANATH MAHADEV DESHPANDE – Respondent


Advocates:
R.U.Goulay, S.W.ARABATHI

( 1 ) 1. This appeal is presented under Section 299 of the Indian Succession Act by the appellant aggrieved by the order of the district Court, Belgaum, granting letter of administration with the copy of the Will stated to have been executed by one girijabai, annexed in favour of the first respondent.

( 2 ) THE facts of the case, in brief, are these: One Girijabai was the daughter of one yeshwant. Two of his brothers were gajanana and Muralidhar. The three brothers are the sons of one Sambarao gunjikar. Girijabai is the sole daughter of yeshwant. She was given in marriage to one shankar Rao. He and Vishwanath deshpande, the first respondent, were the sons of Deshpande. Girijabai died on 23-7-1984. According to the first respondent, late Girijabai had executed a will on 21-7-1984. Under the Will the properties specified therein are fixed deposits in banks, jewellery and other articles. They were all required to be distributed in favour of Prabha and Jyothi, who are the two daughters of Muralidhar, the brother of the appellant, Vishwanath deshpande was appointed as the executor under the Will. He filed an application under Section 276 of the Indian Succession act for grant of probate









Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top