SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1989 Supreme(Kar) 346

K.A.SWAMI
R. KRISHNASWAMY RAO – Appellant
Versus
LAKSHMAIAH SETTY – Respondent


Advocates:
C.R.V.SWAMY RAO, PADUBIDARI RAGHAVENDRA RAO

SWAMI, J.

( 1 ) BY consent of both sides the petition is heard for final disposal.

( 2 ) IN this Civil Revision Petition under section 121-A of the Karnataka Land reforms Act, 1961 (hereinafter referred to as the 'act') the petitioner has challenged the order dated 19-4-1989 passed by the land Reforms Appellate Authority, Mandya in Appeal No. 372 of 1986 allowing Interlocutary applications IV and V filed by the first respondent/appellant.

( 3 ) THE first respondent filed an application in Form No. 7 claiming occupancy right in the lands bearing Section nos. 42 and 49 measuring 3 acres 3 guntas and 17 guntas respectively, situated at beerashetty Village, Taluk Pandavapura. The Land Tribunal rejected the application by the order dated 24-10-1980. The petitioner challenged the same before this court in W. P. 31307/1982. The writ petition came to be transferred to the Land Reforms appellate Authority under Section 19 of the karnataka Act, 19/1986. Pursuant to the transfer the writ petition was numbered as appeal No. 372/1986. In that appeal the first respondent filed two applications I. As IV and V seeking the following reliefs :"for the reasons set out in the accompanying affidavit, t








Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top