SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1990 Supreme(Kar) 1

S.R.RAJASEKHARA MURTHY, M.RAMA JOIS
D. M. SAMYULLA – Appellant
Versus
COMMISSIONER, CORPORATION OF THE CITY OF BANGALORE – Respondent


Advocates:
G.P.SHIVAPRAKASH, H.RANGAVITHALACHAR, R.C.Castelino

RAMA JOIS, ACTG. C. J.

( 1 ) IN this complaint [presented under sections 10 and 12 of the Contempt of courts Act, the complainant has prayed for punishing the respondents for having deliberately and wilfully committed the contempt of the City Civil Court, bangalore, by disobeying its order dated 13-9-1982.

( 2 ) THE undisputed fact of thecase are these: A vacant land measuring 486 square yards belonging to the corporation of the City of Bangalore at briand Square,'mysore Road,bangalore city had been leased to the complainant for establishing a Petrol Bunk. On 28-2-1982 an order of eviction was passed by the Competent Officer acting under Section 4 of the Karnataka public Premises (Eviction of Unauthorised Occupants) Act directing the eviction of the complainant from the said premises. Aggrieved by the said order, the complainant presented an appeal against that order under Section 10 of the said Act on 10-9-1982. On an application made in the said appeal, the Appellate Authority/city r. 45 civil Court made an order on 13-9- 1982 staying the order of eviction. On 23-2-1989 the appeal was dismissed for defaulr. On 28-2-1989 a miscellaneous application under Section 151 read with Orde













Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top