SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1990 Supreme(Kar) 86

M.P.CHANDRAKANTARAJ
C. SHARATH KUMAR – Appellant
Versus
UNIVERSITY OF MYSORE – Respondent


Advocates:
H.N.Narayan, N.DEVDAS, S.P.SHANKAR, Y.C.BRAHMARAYAPPA

M. P. CHANDRAKANTARAJ, J.

( 1 ) IN this petition the petitioner who is a registered graduate in medicine and voter in the 1st respondent-University of Mysore as well as a contesting candidate for the membership of Senate, is aggrieved by the acceptance of the nomination of the. 3rd respondent as a candidate for contesting for the office of Senator in the election scheduled to he held on 11-2-1990.

( 2 ) BRIEFLY stated the facts of the case arc as follows:

( 3 ) SENATE is one of the authorities enumerated under Section20 (a) of the Universities Act (hereinafter referred to as 'the Act' ). In terms of Section 21 of the Act seven members from several faculties including medicine are entitled to be the members of the Senate and in that behalf contest for that office. The petitioner and respondent-3 are such candidates who have filed their nominations. Apparently, the nomination of respondent-3 was objected to by the petitioner before the Returning Officer who was none other than the 2nd respondent, who is also the registrar of the University. Three objections contained in the statement of the petitioner filed as such before him came to be rejected by the Returning Officer by his order da


















Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top